luke: http://uk.youtube.com/user/Luke12000 A system based on free competition creates antagonisms and increases risks to a level that cannot be controlled by any moral guidelines but by the market itself. The chance of being coerced is lower in market anarchy than it is in any state environment, but the coercive force suffered under market anarchy is dramatically increased over what is experienced within or by the state. Subjective perceptions and realities of force and risk vary between individuals based on personality type and demographic group to the extent that the percentage of people that do face coercive force suffer as a result they themselves have an increased chance of perpetrating an increased level of coercive force upon other individuals or groups. Coercive force becomes a tolerated norm, dictated by the market itself: Such as terrorism is defined by statists in this era, coercive force becomes defined by key demographic groups under market anarchy. As such, the rule will not vanish, it will change hands, change ideology, not into one which proponents of market anarchy wish, but one that competition dictates and still within a hierarchical framework that is the underlying structure that has perpetuated age-old group antagonisms. That word again: dictates.