MORAL CRUSADERS complaint:)) marijuana http://www.adventuresinlegalland.com/index.php?/content/view/20/27/ Notice in the cases cited above there are no legal or constitutional exceptions to the doctrine of standing for moral or religious objections. Just because someone thinks its immoral or against their religion to grow or possess marijuana, does not confer standing to complain. This is true even when the moral crusaders call themselves a legislature. Bureaucrats Never Have a Case:)) This is such a simple exercise; I only have to use statism against itself to prove it. By statism, I mean the belief citizens and states exist and the thought patterns supporting such beliefs. Statism is mind control; people surrender their property to men and women pretending to be governors and presidents etc., because they believe they are citizens of a so-called state and must pay their fair share. Talk about abstract concepts. Because of these beliefs, or programming, when a man pretending to be a cop or state attorney files a complaint against a statist, no attention is paid to the many absurdities present, even by the lawyer pretending he has a client, the so-called state attorney. The issue of standing is a great way of demonstrating these absurdities. One of these is despite the fact a complaint is filed, there is no case presented to the court. Statist programming equates complaint with case. People under the influence of such programming dont challenge what a cop or state attorney files as both are perceived asauthority figures. By that, I mean they do not challenge the assertion a complaint presents a case to a court. http://commonlawvenue.com/FeaturedArticles/Featured Articles.htm http://commonlawvenue.com/Documents_CaseLaw/000-Edu.htm common law http://www.commonlawvenue.net/main/EL.htm