Expand ToolbarCollapse ToolbarClose Toolbar
blinkx
  • browse

Web Video

Could Usama Bin Laden have been killed?

Abbas   Afghanistan   Agreed   Aimed   Amounts   Attorney   Avoid   Bin   Both   Bribery   Canal   Careful   Cash   Chaos   Cia   Contracts   Couldnt   Damage   Defense   Definition   Denied   Distrust   Ease   Ehud   Either   Europe   Exactly   Exchange   Forget   Forgot   Frozen   Funds   Gave   Gestures   Goahead   Goodwill   Guilty   Handles   Hostility   Individual   Indonesia   Intended   Israeli   Jenifer   Kohli   Laden   Mahmoud   Mainland   Manhattan   Ministry   Mishaps   Mode   Olmert   Palestinian   Pleaded   Pleads   Possible   Pricey   Procurement   Qaeda   Restrictions   Resumption   Revived   Ruin   Scared   Scaring   Self   Selves   Sights   Strenuously   Structure   Terror   Terrorist   Transportation   Tunnel   Twice   Usama   Usual   Warning   Whatever   

Could Usama Bin Laden have been killed?

Could Usama Bin Laden have been killed?

U.N. official pleads guilty to bribery charges. Nishan Kohli has pleaded guilty to providing a former U.N. procurement officer with cash, and pricey Manhattan real estate, in exchange for help, winning more than $65 million in contracts with the world body, a U.S. attorney said Thursday.The French Defense Ministry strenuously denied a report Thursday, that its special forces in Afghanistan twice had Al Qaeda leader Usama bin Laden in their sights, but did not get the go-ahead to kill him.Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert agreed Saturday to release $100 million in frozen funds, to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, and ease West Bank travel restrictions, goodwill gestures that revived hopes for a resumption of peace talks, after years of hostility and distrust.Those were the headlines for today. Oh, I almost forgot: CIA gave terror warning against the Canal tunnel to France. According to the CIA it will be more then likely that a terrorist attack will be aimed against the Canal tunnel. Both the French and the British are taking step to avoid any mishaps. Let me explain something to you here: any mode of transportation, or any structure which handles large amounts of people, is a possible target for terrorist attacks. You can do either 2 things: 1 Be very careful and go on with your life, or 2 get so scared that you ruin your social life. By giving this warning, the CIA it self made a terrorist attack to the Canal tunnel, and all those people who are possible going to use it, to go to or from England to mainland Europe. The CIA just scared millions of people, not just a little bit, no people are scared seriously. And is that not what terror is all about. Not just about killing people. No, terror is also about scaring those who didn't die. And that is exactly what people like Usama Bin Laden wants to happen. Chaos, and more chaos. By giving warnings like these, against individual targets, or complete countries like Indonesia, one doesn't safe lives, but do create serious economical damage to the intended targets. The terrorists couldn't have done it better them selves. Let everyone just go one with their lives, be careful whatever you do, where ever you go. It does not make a lot of difference for you personally wether you get killed by a bomb or by a speeding car. Your dead in both cases. And if you are anything like me, just avoid lots of people, as large groups of people are per definition dangerous. With or without terrorists.But, as usual, I don't care whatever you do, as long as you don't forget: love a soldier. Love, Jenifer. bloomjenifer@yahoo.co.uk

Web Video | December 25, 2006

Tags:. .funds. .europe. .damage. .self. .cash

Collapse Toolbar